Cubs catcher Koyie Hill awaits the throw from Reed Johnson to tag Edgar Renteria out at the plate late in Wednesday's game. |
Final Record: 62-81
As weird as morally wrong as it sounds, the Pirates marched into Wrigley Field last weekend as the statistically better team. Being a young Cubs fan, I still felt the Cubbies mysterious aura of superiority against the Bucs, seeing as they've had it for, like, the last 20 years.
But the Pirates came to play. Recently called up starter Brian Burres' only blemish was a Carlos Pena home run before the Pirates bullpen was perfect for nearly four innings, holding their 3-1 lead to the end. A typical, forgettable game which wasted a great start from Ryan Dempster.
Derrek Lee returned from the DL on Saturday and started at first for Pittsburgh. His only two homers as a Pirate came against the Cubs in that four-game series in early August, which was actually his Pirates debut. His third homer also came against the Cubs, a grand slam off Carlos Marmol in the 9th of a 5-3 game. The Pirates took the lead and the win thanks to Marmol finding yet another method to lose a game. This was his ninth blown save of the season, an unacceptable mark by any measurement. After being fooled last season, I've come to the conclusion that he isn't made to be a closer. Marmol is an 8th inning guy, and should be treated as such for the rest of his career.
You know the whole 'get in front of the ball' tactic coaches teach outfielders starting in T-ball? Apparently Alfonso Soriano (still) hasn't gotten the technique down. |
Dontrelle Willis made his first start at Wrigley Monday afternoon since May 29, 2007, except this time he started for the Reds. After a sharp first few innings, he lost it during a rally in the 5th inning, where five straight batters got on base. The Cubs' 4-1 lead barely held up to the 9th, when Marmol rebounded with a 1-2-3 inning, which was surprising to say the least. Vegas oddsmakers must be stumped on how to gauge this guy.
Mike Leake started Tuesday, and the Cubs basically gave him a complete-game shutout. Swinging way too aggressively, the Cubs were hanging on to their last hope in rookie Bryan LaHair in a 2-0 game with a man on when LaHair launched a ball onto Sheffield to tie the game with two outs in the 9th. The Cubs would lose in extra innings, but this LaHair dude is some kind of exciting. 38 home runs this season alone in the Minor Leagues?! His power numbers are unheard of and were leading the Minors by a wide margin when he was called up. At 28, many would call him a late bloomer. But with this ridiculous power, I hope he finds a bench spot on the roster next year while they decide which defensive position for him will cause the team the least damage.
The Reds were the ones who came back on Wednesday, but the 3-3 tie game was short-lived. Pena launched a three-run monster blast over the bleachers. Marmol got save #33 and the Cubs took the series from the Reds. This series was very tight and each game came down to the end, but I really liked the starting pitching they displayed here.
The Cubs now need to go 19-0 the rest of the season to get to .500, 14-5 to match last season's record, and 11-8 to avoid losing 90 games this season, which is big from a moral standpoint. Given the easy schedule remaining, hopefully it will be somewhere around the third option, as the first two are unrealistic for this team.
Next up for the Cubs is the Mets in New York, where they haven't played since April 2010. The streak of not playing there for that long was the longest among NL teams. Because of September 11, the Cubs and Mets, two teams well out of contention, will be ESPN's Sunday Night Baseball. I can't remember the last time ESPN showed a September game between two teams a combined 40 games out of their divisions or whatever. Not that I'm complaining, but the producers definitely were hoping it would be the Yankees hosting the Rangers or some other contender for the ceremonious ten-year September 11 shindig. Hey Cubbies, just don't embarrass yourselves on national TV like you have a knack for doing these days (see: Starlin Being Starlin?).
No comments:
Post a Comment